Posts: 11
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
what is better? Berkley vanish fluorocarbon or the
Berkley trilene better are they both invisible underwater, does one strech less then the other?
thanks
[signature]
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation:
0
berkely vanish flourocarben
[signature]
Posts: 193
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2006
Reputation:
0
Are we talking about a Berkley Trilene Fluorocarbon, or just the trileine mono?
[signature]
Posts: 199
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
0
I tried them both and its a toss up for me. Vanish seems to be more brittle and prone to breaking. The 100% Fluoro in the gold package seems really wiry and stiff to me but its definitely stronger than the Vanish. Any 100% fluorocarbon line will be invisible under water.
Try Seaguar Invis-X. Its around the same price as the Trilene 100% Fluoro (gold pack), maybe cheaper. I use it on baitcasters, spinning reels... no complaints. It is a little stiffer than regular mono, but overall it handles well and 8# test is hard to break even when you're stuck on a rock or log and trying to break it off.
[signature]
Posts: 11
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
ok man thanks alot
[signature]
Posts: 20
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
0
I like the Vanish, I use the 4-6lb for dropshotting and also use the heavier one for spinnerbaits and cranks. Very happy with this line and fairly price.
[signature]