Fishing Forum › General Discussion › Hunting v
HUNTERS ? NOT !

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
HUNTERS ? NOT !
davetclown Offline
Shark
**********
Posts: 23,576
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2001
Reputation: 0
#2
10-21-2003, 07:52 AM
I did not see where it said hunters were the culprets. most asuradly it was poachers at the vary least, drunken vandels is a good posibility as well. so if they dont mention hunters then dont say a word.[Wink]

be sure to check the wording of the article before you make us look like uneducated hicks. [crazy]

I am a educated hick, at least that is what my deploma said [sly]
[signature]
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
HUNTERS ? NOT ! - by lonehunter - 10-21-2003, 02:00 AM
Re: [lonehunter] HUNTERS ? NOT ! - by davetclown - 10-21-2003, 07:52 AM
Re: [davetclown] HUNTERS ? NOT ! - by lonehunter - 10-21-2003, 09:02 PM
Re: [lonehunter] HUNTERS ? NOT ! - by davetclown - 10-21-2003, 10:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)