03-18-2016, 01:56 PM
[quote Dog-lover]For someone who personally doesn’t care if the Willard inlet is open or not, and for someone who doesn’t specifically target Walleye you seem to imply that people who did care and actively participated in the RACK process should have simply known better.[/quote]
What I am implying/saying is that just because you spoke your mind, does NOT mean that the WB or RACs should have catered to your desires. Their job is to listen to all input and make a decision. Some fishermen/hunters believe that the RACs and WB should automatically do what people suggest and that if they don't listen and do what is contrary to what was proposed that they are not being "listened" to. That is BS! Again, their job is to listen to all available input and make a decision...many times the input given contradicts and competes, so they have to piss somebody off. This time it was just those who wanted the inlet closed...
[signature]
What I am implying/saying is that just because you spoke your mind, does NOT mean that the WB or RACs should have catered to your desires. Their job is to listen to all input and make a decision. Some fishermen/hunters believe that the RACs and WB should automatically do what people suggest and that if they don't listen and do what is contrary to what was proposed that they are not being "listened" to. That is BS! Again, their job is to listen to all available input and make a decision...many times the input given contradicts and competes, so they have to piss somebody off. This time it was just those who wanted the inlet closed...
[signature]