Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Deer Management in Michigan
#1
[font "arial, helvetica, sans-serif"][#003366]Deer Management in Michigan[/#003366][/font]
[font "arial, helvetica, sans-serif"][black]

[Image: deer_51698_7.gif]Deer have been a valuable resource in Michigan since the first Native Americans began to hunt them. Prior to European settlement, Michigan had an abundant deer herd in the south. The mixture of hardwoods, wetlands, bogs and forest openings was perfect for deer. There were few deer in the virgin forests of the north, which were inhabited mostly by elk and moose. The mature trees were so dense that sunlight could not reach the forest floor and therefore little deer food was available.



As farmers and settlers moved into southern Michigan, deer were exterminated by removal of cover and by unregulated shooting--deer were mostly gone by 1870. Logging of forests in the north produced an opposite effect--more openings, brush, and young forests--the northern herd climbed to estimated 1 million deer in the 1880s.



[#006400]Depopulation and rebounding[/#006400]

As railroads were developed and provided access into the wilderness, market hunters slaughtered hundreds of thousands of deer. Early measures to control market hunting were not very successful, but finally in 1895 a law, which really marked the beginning of deer management in Michigan, established a deer hunting season and limited the number of deer that could be harvested.



What followed were decades of ups and downs in the deer population resulting from changes in hunting regulations and available habitat, compounded by a lack of natural predators.



In 1914, Game Commissioner William R. Oates estimated that there were only 45,000 deer in Michigan and recommended changing regulations so only antlered deer could be taken by hunters, as this would increase the size of the deer herd. The deer herd began to rebound. Some of the increase was due to habitat changes as logged-over areas produced deer browse. In addition, shrubs and other deer foods developed in many areas that had been cleared for agriculture, but abandoned.



[#006400]The "Deer Problem"[/#006400]

By 1930, the abundance of deer was recognized. The first discussion of deer-vehicle accidents began. There was also a significant amount of winter starvation and over-browsing in cedar swamps where field investigators reported a shortage of food and cover for the growing herd. Mr. Ilo Bartlett, the state's first deer biologist, reported that there were 1.125 million deer in the state in 1937 and he began to talk about the "Deer Problem." About 1/3 of the deer at this time were in the Upper Peninsula and 2/3 in the northern Lower Peninsula--only a very few deer were present in southern Michigan.



Despite the state's attempt to provide more hunting lands and to place more deer habitat in public ownership, the deer problem continued until the herd peaked at about 1.5 million deer in the late 1940s. At first with small hunts beginning in 1941 and then in larger ones, antlerless deer were once again allowed to be taken by hunters in an attempt reduce the size of the deer herd. However, before that could happen, the habitat for deer collapsed, due to a combination of pressure from a large herd and an increase in forested areas--mature stands of timber once again began to appear on formerly logged lands. The deer population once again dropped.



To answer the habitat problem, the Department of Conservation developed a Deer Range Improvement Program (DRIP) and a goal of 1 million deer was established for spring 1981. The success of the DRIP, along with series of mild winters in the 1980s and artificial feeding of deer by the public, further propelled the herd to a new peak of 2 million deer in 1989. Signs of distress in the herd appeared again. Deer-vehicle accidents exceeded 40,000 per year with an average of 5 people killed and 1,500 injured each year. Crop damage reappeared.



[#006400]Present policy[/#006400]

In the late 1980s, the Department of Natural Resources reaffirmed its goal of 1.3 million deer in the fall herd (which was biologically the same as the 1971 goal of 1 million deer in the spring herd) and continues to work toward that goal, but with an updated buck to doe ratio. Unfortunately, the large deer herd has begun to have a significant impact on their own habitat and the habitats of other animals. In some areas, they have nearly eliminated certain plants which may provide food and or shelter for other wildlife.



The build-up of deer in urban and suburban areas has also become a challenge. Other than fencing, nonlethal control methods have usually been unsuccessful or impractical, and lethal controls have eventually been applied. Management of deer in urban and suburban settings will provide many future opportunities for public education and involvement.



[url "http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10370_12145_12205-56904--,00.html"][#0000ff]Click Here[/#0000ff][/url] for more information about Michigan's deer.[/black][/font]
[signature]
Reply
#2
[font "Times New Roman"]14 deer shot at Indian Springs[/font]

[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]

[font "Times New Roman"][/font] [font "Times New Roman"]
[/font]

[font "Times New Roman"][/font]

[url "http://www.spinalcolumnonline.com/action.lasso?-response=/action.lasso?-database=altpareditorial&-layout=authorsearch&-Response=editorialtableindex.lasso&-op=cn&t2=Michael%20Hoskins&-op=cn&t5=Spinal%20Column&-op=eq&t19=Y&-sortfield=d1&-sortorde%20"][font "Times New Roman"]by Michael Hoskins[/font][/url]

[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]

[font "Times New Roman"][/font]


[font "Times New Roman"][#000080]December 23, 2002 - [/#000080]Volunteers have begun shooting deer in the Indian Springs Metropark, part of a continued effort to control metropark deer populations by killing some of the deer that feed on and destroy park vegetation needed by birds and small mammals.[/font]

[font "Times New Roman"]According to Dave Moilanen, the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority (HCMA) chief of interpretive programs, 14 deer were shot and taken from Indian Springs during the second weekend of the month, between Dec. 14 and 15. He had said previously the goal had been removing 45 deer from the metropark.

"We still thought (that number) was a pretty reasonable number for us to start with for one weekend," he said, adding that another muzzle-loading hunt is not scheduled. "We do plan on applying to the (state Department of Natural Resources) for an out-of-season permit to use sharpshooting. That will be sometime in January and should help us get up to that 45 (deer goal)."

This is fourth consecutive year of controlled hunting and sharpshooting to thin metropark deer herds since the state House passed legislation in December 1999. Since then, more than 1,100 deer have been killed in the first three years.

This is the second year of such hunts at Indian Springs Metropark, which is located in White Lake and Springfield townships.

Moilanen said 89 deer were shot at Indian Springs last year. This year, he reiterated the HCMA wants to remove 45 deer from the metropark.

"At Indian Springs, we did fairly well last year," he said. "We estimated the populations after last year's hunts and based this year's reproduction, the deer herd is about 115. We'd like it be between 77 and 88, so if we do 45 we should be right there."

In conducting the hunt, Moilanen said typically between 10 and 15 hunters are outside conducting the hunt.

Meanwhile, deer control hunts are also expected early next year at Kensington Metropark, located in Milford Township.

Moilanen said sharpshooting with trained rangers will occur sometime around the end of January or early February, though permits haven't been obtained from the DNR yet. He said once those permits are granted, a definite date and target number will be set.

"We haven't set a number yet, but we'll probably be looking (to remove) around 50 or so. That's maintenance, since we think the population is about 171, so that's the number we might need to get it down closer to 120."

While this is only Indian Springs second year involved in the program, deer management efforts reportedly have been effective at Kensington.

"We're seeing positive effects from vegetation at Kensington, specifically that some of these plants are returning," he said. "Also, one sign (that it's working) is that we could grow a pumpkin crop there at the farm center for the first time in years. We know we're making some real good headway with these hunts." [/font] [font "Times New Roman"]
[/font]

[font "Times New Roman"]Michael Hoskins is a staff writer for the Spinal Column Newsweekly[/font]
[signature]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)