04-01-2008, 09:49 PM
i've been lurking for a while and decided i'd post. a little about me: i grew up fishing for trout, mainly at strawberry. i got into warm water fishing about 20 years ago and quickly became addicted to walleye fishing. i mainly fish starvation, deercreek and in the past yuba. i do fish for other species from time to time, but i mainly fish for walleye.
i've noticed that the dwr is encouraging heavy walleye harvest on yuba. i couldn't agree more. i just wish we would hear the same about starvation and dercreek. my question is why place a limit on walleye in either starvation, deercreek, or yuba? i can somewhat understand the 1 fish over 24" size restricion, but personally i think there should be no limit on walleye under 24". in starvation, deercreek and yuba the walleye fishing fluctuates with the amount of limited forage. starvation was set to crash until some idiot dumped perch in there. who knows what the future will be there now, but based on other reservoirs with a perch forage base it's hard to be optimistic. deercreek seems to fluctuate with the perch, although it doesn't seem to be as bad as yuba. and then of course there's yuba. when there's perch it's an amazing walleye fishery. when the perch are gone there's good trout fishing. my theory is that there aren't enough walleye anglers in utah to have an impact on the walleye numbers in these reservoirs. even if there are enough anglers i doubt that their catch rate vs time spent fishing would have an impact. but let's say it happened. let's assume that enough anglers went to yuba, starvation and deercreek and kept enough walleyes that it severely affected the populations. so what? if that did happen the dwr could reinstate a limit. no matter how over fished they could be the walleyes would never be completely gone. they would come back. meanwhile, with the walleye numbers down the perch could flourish. imo the perch, and whatever else the walleyes are eating, need as much help as they can get. we've all seen the crashes at yuba in the past and the fluctuations at deercreek. it's hard to believe that starvation will be any different. so why not harvest the fish instead of letting them starve to death? as a walleye fisherman i would hate to see walleyes over harvested, but that seems like a much better alternative to a crash. my guess is that if they were over harvested they would bounce back much sooner because the food would still be there. whereas when it crashes we have to wait for the perch to come back then the walleye come back. it seems like it's been about 10 years since there was good walleye fishing at yuba. 10 years of trout fishing at yuba is about 10 too many for me. i'd really hate to see this cycle continue.
sorry for the long post.
[signature]
i've noticed that the dwr is encouraging heavy walleye harvest on yuba. i couldn't agree more. i just wish we would hear the same about starvation and dercreek. my question is why place a limit on walleye in either starvation, deercreek, or yuba? i can somewhat understand the 1 fish over 24" size restricion, but personally i think there should be no limit on walleye under 24". in starvation, deercreek and yuba the walleye fishing fluctuates with the amount of limited forage. starvation was set to crash until some idiot dumped perch in there. who knows what the future will be there now, but based on other reservoirs with a perch forage base it's hard to be optimistic. deercreek seems to fluctuate with the perch, although it doesn't seem to be as bad as yuba. and then of course there's yuba. when there's perch it's an amazing walleye fishery. when the perch are gone there's good trout fishing. my theory is that there aren't enough walleye anglers in utah to have an impact on the walleye numbers in these reservoirs. even if there are enough anglers i doubt that their catch rate vs time spent fishing would have an impact. but let's say it happened. let's assume that enough anglers went to yuba, starvation and deercreek and kept enough walleyes that it severely affected the populations. so what? if that did happen the dwr could reinstate a limit. no matter how over fished they could be the walleyes would never be completely gone. they would come back. meanwhile, with the walleye numbers down the perch could flourish. imo the perch, and whatever else the walleyes are eating, need as much help as they can get. we've all seen the crashes at yuba in the past and the fluctuations at deercreek. it's hard to believe that starvation will be any different. so why not harvest the fish instead of letting them starve to death? as a walleye fisherman i would hate to see walleyes over harvested, but that seems like a much better alternative to a crash. my guess is that if they were over harvested they would bounce back much sooner because the food would still be there. whereas when it crashes we have to wait for the perch to come back then the walleye come back. it seems like it's been about 10 years since there was good walleye fishing at yuba. 10 years of trout fishing at yuba is about 10 too many for me. i'd really hate to see this cycle continue.
sorry for the long post.
[signature]